An Attempt To Deteriorate The Creditworthiness of Indian Entities

Introduction:

The growth story of India in almost every sector is not alien to the world. India has witnessed significant advancements in the financial and corporate sectors. However, the growth is also often coupled with financial controversies, and a ‘favourite companies’ tag is circulated in almost every political regime in India. Similar is the recent case of the ‘alleged’ bribery case of the Adani Group by the SEC in the USA, which comes just a few years after the Hindenburg report. These allegations have not only hurt the reputation of the Adani Group but have also cast a shadow over the broader corporate sector of India which can put a weight on companies while raising funds overseas and affect foreign investor’s confidence. This article delves into how this can lead to deterioration of the creditworthiness of Indian companies. 

Background/Context:

The Adani Group is one of the many conglomerates in India and has recently been no stranger to controversy. All of this started when Hindenburg Research, a short-seller from the U.S., issued a statement accusing the Adani Group of stock manipulation, accounting fraud, and excessive use of offshore entities in order to inflate its valuation by reducing the free float of shares available for sale in the open market. This report led to a downward spiral for the Adani Group, erasing more than $100 billion in market capitalization across all the listed stock of the entity. Despite denials by the Adani Group, this report led to a huge erosion of trust among institutional and retail investors, both domestic and international wherein the Adani group also had to recall its FPO. The allegations by the Hindenburg ‘epor’ were sweeping. It not only led to a sharp reduction in Adani Group’s stock prices but also led to  increased scrutiny and caution of Indian corporate governance as a whole in the financial market frontier. Investors started questioning the transparency and accountability of large Indian conglomerates, especially those with high political connections. As credit rating agencies closely monitored developments, the entire Indian corporate sector came under the direct scrutiny of the government agencies which acted as a rock for the companies to raise funds and issue securities overseas. Further putting cherry on the cake in mid-2024,Series of bribery allegations were put against the CFO and chairman of Adani Group which  further damaged the conglomerate’s reputation and increased concern about the financial and governance practices of Indian companies. The bribery allegations added to the fallout from the Hindenburg report, as they suggested the possibility of systemic governance weaknesses in India’s corporate world and consistent non compliance of corporaSte laws and security laws. The controversies surrounding the Adani Group have hugely affected investor’s confidence In Indian conglomerates. Total Energies delayed its $300 million investment in Adani Green, citing the need for stricter due diligence. Similarly, Vedanta postponed its bond sale, reflecting increasing caution among investors amid governance concerns. On the global front, Kenya’s cancellation of a power purchase agreement with Adani Power highlights growing reputational risks tied to the group. These developments point to the larger consequences that governance and compliance issues have for the Adani Group, which not only damage its credibility but also create a sense of distrust over the transparency and accountability of Indian businesses on the world map. 

The Impact of the Allegations On Creditworthiness:

The Adani bribery case, coupled with the earlier Hindenburg report, is not just a legal and reputational issue but also a financial one. The cumulative effect of these scandals created a ripple effect, undermining investor confidence in Indian corporate governance. When large corporations are implicated in high-profile controversies, it raises fundamental questions about transparency, regulatory oversight, and governance across the board. This broader distrust extends beyond the specific companies involved, affecting the creditworthiness of other major players in the market. Credit rating agencies, which assess the risk of debt issuances, take factors such as corporate governance, financial transparency, and political connections into account. The Adani-related controversies created a perception of systemic governance weaknesses, leading to a cautious approach by investors. For Vedanta, a company already dealing with issues such as high debt levels and regulatory scrutiny, the Adani scandals heightened investor concerns, negatively impacting its credit profile. Vedanta’s delayed bond sale is a prime example of how market sentiment can shift dramatically due to external scandals. Even though Vedanta was not directly implicated in either the Hindenburg report or the bribery allegations, its association with the broader Indian corporate ecosystem caused investors to reassess its financial health. The result was heightened scrutiny, reduced investor appetite, and unfavourable terms for debt issuance. 

Need for reforms:

The corporate scandals that have recently surfaced in India are a grim reminder of the critical need for comprehensive reforms aimed at restoring investor confidence and fostering accountability within the corporate sector. Such reforms are essential to cultivate an environment where financial practices are transparent, reliable, and subjected to meticulous scrutiny. The establishment of heightened auditing standards under the National Financial Reporting Authority is a milestone to more reliable financial reporting and thus reduces the possibility for failures in governance. In addition, the need for a strong corporate structure that emphasizes transparency cannot be overstated. It is crucial that stakeholders, including investors, employees, and the public, are assured of the integrity of corporate operations. This includes developing strict legal procedures that require verifiable evidence when serious allegations arise, thereby protecting businesses from reputational damage that is not deserved. Where foreign parties are involved in resorting to false propaganda, there is a need for stricter penalties as this would discourage such bad activities. Further, a dynamic market with unhindered inflow of funds from FIIs requires the government’s active and continuous intervention to finance and expand businesses. Such programmes will help restore the trust of investors and improve the overall health of the Indian economy.

Conclusion:

These various controversies surrounding the Adani Group, ranging from serious charges of stock market manipulation and bribery, have shed significant light on some of the serious governance lapses within India’s corporate landscape. The turmoil created by these events has not only damaged investor confidence but also catalysed delays in key investment initiatives, such as the anticipated injection of $300 million from Total Energies. In addition, reputational damage by the group crosses national borders as illustrated by the cancellation of a key power purchase agreement in Kenya that continues to erode international confidence in enterprises from India. At a macroeconomic scale, governance-related challenges have raised global concerns about the transparency and accountability of businesses operating in India, negatively impacting their credit ratings and ability to engage in international markets. As a result of these issues, credit rating agencies are now closely examining corporate governance practices, which has led to increased borrowing costs and has made financial access more complex for Indian companies. To prevent such destructive occurrences from happening again, there is an urgent need for holistic changes that include increased regulatory authority. Simultaneously, companies need to be responsible in their actions and have more accountability towards their stakeholders and thereby address these issues that compromise corporate integrity and investor confidence.

Sources:

  1. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/
  2. https://www.business-standard.com/companies/news/gautam-adani-charged-by-us-in-265-million-bribery-case-top-things-we-know-124112100195_1.html
  3. https://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=Awr1Siv.w1JnLAIAwja7HAx.;_ylu=Y29sbwNzZzMEcG9zAzEEdnRpZAMEc2VjA3Nj/RV=2/RE=1734686974/RO=10/RU=https%3a%2f%2fwww.dnaindia.com%2fbusiness%2freport-big-blow-to-gautam-adani-total-energies-suspends-new-investments-in-adani-group-after-3119624/RK=2/RS=_agJ3zBrzX8aVlpFnq7eJ1y4Qc0-
  4. https://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=AwrKBVwyxFJnDwIAL067HAx.;_ylu=Y29sbwNzZzMEcG9zAzEEdnRpZAMEc2VjA3Nj/RV=2/RE=1734687026/RO=10/RU=https%3a%2f%2feconomictimes.indiatimes.com%2fmarkets%2fbonds%2fvedanta-pauses-bond-sale-plans-after-adani-market-volatility%2farticleshow%2f115522711.cms%23%3a~%3atext%3dVedanta%2520Resources%2520is%2520delaying%2520a%2520potential%2520dollar%2520bond%2coffering%2520until%2520next%2520week%252C%2520hoping%2520for%2520yield%2520stabilization./RK=2/RS=SHXnN5hV1XLHzC8gkDWquYG5Szo-
  5. https://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=Awrx.adWxFJn7gEAn.K7HAx.;_ylu=Y29sbwNzZzMEcG9zAzEEdnRpZAMEc2VjA3Ny/RV=2/RE=1734687062/RO=10/RU=https%3a%2f%2fhindenburgresearch.com%2fadani%2f/RK=2/RS=NYl3tKxi_gIiFmikWynQ7PnntZY-

Shubham Garg

Member

Session 5

Session 5- Unraveling Equity Derivatives: Insights from the Fifth Development Session The Fifth Development Session…

Read More

Downfall of Byjus

Byju Raveendran was born on 5th January 1980 in the Azikhode village of Kerala, India…

Read More

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *